Monday, April 25, 2011

Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
April 14, 2011

TSA has defended the groping of a 6 year-old girl, saying it followed policy. Yet in Nov. 2010, TSA vowed no ‘enhanced’ pat-downs for children under 12.

Busted: TSA lied about promise not to grope children 13tsa girl

Busted: TSA lied about promise not to grope children 13tsa girl

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) contradicted itself, even to the point of outright lying, in responding to controversy about a 6 year-old girl who received a groping pat-down AFTER already being sent through a body scanner. The video went viral after appearing on DrudgeReport.com and many other sites. TSA typically explained away this unnerving experience that left the girl in tears by arguing that the action is perfectly normal, follows all procedures and keeps us safe from terrorism, all, of course, in the name of ‘safety.’

You see, the TSA rationalized in its latest defense that, “terrorists are willing to manipulate societal norms to evade detection.” Thus, TSA would have it, we must abandon societal norms [and laws] like not touching children in their private parts, and instead subject them to pre-crime inspections. According to the logic, no women & children, little old ladies or men handicapped in wheelchairs or implanted with modern medical devices, no body cavity or private part is safe from extensive probing by the “guardians” in government. As the Justice Department recently proclaimed, the TSA assumes the authority to literally strip-search people on demand.

So, the shocking video seen across the alternative blogosphere today was standard operating procedure, as the TSA pointed out in its most recent blog posting, ‘Screening of 6 Year-Old at MSY‘:

A video taken of one of our officers patting down a six year-old has attracted quite a bit of attention. Some folks are asking if the proper procedures were followed. Yes. TSA has reviewed the incident and the security officer in the video followed the current standard operating procedures.

Yet in a November 2010 posting ‘TSA Myth or Fact: Leaked Images, Handcuffed Hosts, Religious Garb, and More!,’ written in the hopes of dispelling ‘rumors’ about the new invasive pat-downs, Blogger Bob of the TSA claims that children under 12 are supposed to receive amodified pat-down.

Pat-downs Myths & Facts
Myth: All children will receive pat-downs.
Fact: TSA officers are trained to work with parents to ensure a respectful screening process for the entire family, while providing the best possible security for all travelers.Children 12 years old and under who require extra screening will receive a modified pat down.

So why did the little girl receive the full, invasive treatment, particularly after having already been screened via body scanner?

After all, the ‘modified’ TSA policy was even publicly announced back in November, as in the USA Today article, “No ‘enhanced’ pat-downs for kids, TSA says.” It cites comments from TSA spokeswoman Kristin Lee who stated, “After a thorough risk assessment and after hearing concerns from parents, we made the decision that a modified pat-down would be used for children 12 years old and under who require extra screening.”

Further, the TSA blog deceives the public over the perception that pat-downs only occur for passengers who opt-out of the scanners, writing, “Only passengers who alarm a walk through metal detector or AIT machine or opt out of the AIT receive a pat-down.” However, the girl’s parents revealed what the video did not show– that their child had already been sent through the body scanners, and was then selected for a groping ‘enhanced’ pat-down. If the girl somehow alerted the scanner, the TSA did not disclose that fact to her parents when they asked why she was receiving the additional screening. In fact, the parents were given no reason, but were instead threatened non-verbally to comply with their daughter’s pat-down or face ‘trouble,’ as they told Good Morning America. Is intimidation part of the official policy, too?

Adding insult to injury, the TSA has previously lied about the fact that body scanners can store nude images of the passengers it surveys (and have done so) . Couple that with the controversy raised over the fact that body scanners violate many child indecency laws, or that numerous cases have arisen over perverted and/or criminal TSA employees abusing their power. These parents weren’t comfortable with an officer touching their child, and they shouldn’t be comfortable sending their kids through naked body scanners either.WeWontFly.com, an organization who helped launch the would-be protests against scanners last Thanksgiving, have initiated a campaign demanding an end to pat-downs for children. Second that, but for scanners, too– scanners are both invasive and dangerous, all the more so on both counts for children.

Meanwhile, CNN aired a piece largely justifying the pat-down of the 6 year-old, which featured two individuals supposedly representative of the public who were both almost completely apologetic for TSA power. A mother said her four year-old ‘understood’ why TSA did what it did, telling other passengers to “suck it up” for airline safety. She added that it ‘only took a few seconds’ to undergo a pat-down, even if it was like the one of the 6 year-old that CNN reporters showed her.

Similar duplicity was expressed by the TSA during the backlash leading up to the Thanksgiving 2010 holidays. The TSA insisted that use of body scanners was indispensable to prevent terrorists and could not be curbed because of public outrage; then days later, TSA stood down at airports across the United States and turned off scanners to prevent protesters from gaining any traction or publicity. Then, as if in concert, mainstream media outlets gave reports that the airports were running smoothly, omitting the fact that body scanners were turned off, proclaimed the protests a failure, and then misrepresented public support for TSA by selectively representing travelers with only supportive interviews.

Such contradictions are typical of any overly authoritarian government; its very nature will always argue for more power and say anything to prevent that power from being taken back. Also typical is that thing with known liars… what else are they lying about?

Whatever delusional reasons TSA comes up with to justify its harassment of young children, ordinary Americans and travelers from around the world, the people clearly aren’t buying it. At a glance, comments in TSA’s own moderated comments section are overwhelmingly against airport abuse. Here are just a few:

Busted: TSA lied about promise not to grope children 13tsa blog comments

Busted: TSA lied about promise not to grope children 13tsa blog comments

Video- TSA Gropes 8-Year Old Boy, In Front Of Outraged Mother

Agency lied, said it had stopped frisking children

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
April 14, 2011

Following the emergence of a video of a TSA agent subjecting a scared and confused 6-year old girl to an invasive full body pat down this week, another incident has come to light today in which an 8-year old boy was recently groped in the same way. This despite the fact that the TSA claimed it had changed its security procedure for children.

Young Spencer Sheahan was looking forward to the trip of a lifetime to Disneyland, but the fun was cut short at Portland International Airport in Oregon when a TSA agent pulled the child out of line and frisked him up and down in front of his stunned mother.

“They went up his leg, into that area, down the next leg, up here (chest), felt all over,” Heather Sheahan tells KGW News.

Ms Shehan quickly grabbed her camera and took photos to document the incident.

The pictures can be seen in the following KGW report:

“I was confused,” Spencer told the reporter. “I did not know what they were going to do to me.”

The boy’s reaction to the incident was almost identical to that of 6-year old Anna Drexel who was groped on video by an agent at New Orleans International airport.

Both children thought they had done something wrong and were being punished. Little Anna broke down in tears afterwards, according to her mother, who said she found it impossible to adequately explain to her daughter why the incident had occurred.

The following is a brief interview with the girl’s mother, posted today by Russia Today:

In our follow up report on the incident today we explain how the TSA outright lied by announcing late last year that it had modified the pat-down procedure for children under 12, when in fact the same invasive search of private areas of the body is still being conducted by TSA agents, as proven by both the cases of Anna Drexel and Spencer Sheahan.

——————————————————————

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

Video- Rand Paul: ‘Pentagon thinks it’s too big to audit’; no serious budget cuts proposed in Washington

Infowars.com
April 15, 2011

“We threatened to shut down Washington over nothing, because we’re not cutting spending in any serious way…” that was just one part of Senator Rand Paul’s fiery floor speech blasting both sides of the isle for failing to make a sober effort to operate from a balanced budget.

Paul lashed out at those who’ve bashed the Tea Party over spending issues, claiming that its aims are only ‘good government.’ “You know it’s amazing to me to be lectured to, and hear about how awful the Tea Party is, what the Tea Party represents, from folks who’ve never been to a Tea Party. You know, come on down to a Tea Party, bring your Huey Long rhetoric- a chicken in every pot, a windmill in every… backyard. Bring it on down to the Tea Party; let’s have a discussion. Let’s bring it to the American public. The Tea Party’s been lectured about spending; who among you has voted against an appropriations bill? We haven’t even seen an appropriations bill in this body in over a year; we haven’t seen a budget. We’re spending $2 trillion dollars a year we don’t have, and they’re hear blaming it on the Tea Party. Who’s in charge here? It’s not the Tea Party…”

The Junior Senator also commented that the Pentagon ‘thinks they’re too big to audit,’ referencing the bailout rhetoric about banks ‘too big to fail.’ Federal Reserve records showed, Paul indicated, that the U.S. had been funding Gaddafi only months before it started bombing Libya.
From Campaign for Liberty:

Rand Paul spoke on the Senate floor Thursday to challenge his colleagues to get serious about cutting spending and tackling the debt crisis. He also urged them to trust in the American people’s creativity and innovation instead of government power.

Audio- Gerald Celente on The Bruce Collins Show- 04/09/11

Video- Obama's broken promises kick-off campaign for 2012

Video- IMF: Disease or Cure?

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Video- Adam Vs The Man: Obama's wrong economic answers, Economic diversions, Guantanamo Bay military tribunals

Video- Adam Vs The Man:

Obama's wrong economic answers, Economic diversions, Guantanamo Bay military tribunals

Video- Lou Dobbs & Jesse Ventura Disgusted By TSA Groping Six Year Old Girl

Video- The Underwear Bomber Reporting from Police State 4; Rise of F.E.M.A.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Video- A New Breed of Terrorist Threatens America

Video- Police Beat, Taser Man At Baseball Game

Video- TSA Agent Gropes A 6 Year Old Girl - Then Drug Tests Her !!!

Video- TSA Agent Gropes A 6 Year Old Girl - Then Drug Tests Her !!!

Video- DC Mayor Arrested in Budget Protest

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Video- Obama lies to Chinese people about openness & free flow of information

Whats with the guy at 00:24 that appears to turn on his ipod and put on the headphones. He may be putting on those "translation headphones" or trying to record "Barry's" speech and wanted to adjust the mic. in the headphones, but I'm going to go with the fact that the inaccuracies of the speech were too much for that guy and he needed a little bit of truth. ....... So he turned on the audiobook of "Forrest Gump". Hey, its kinda true!!

Video- Gerald Celente Trends in the news 22 Mar 2011

Video- Roberts: Pentagon budget is the result of corruption

Video- Silent Killer: NATO denies depleted uranium bombs blasted Libya

Video- Rush Hour Terror: 12 dead, hundreds injured in Minsk metro carnage

Video- Shock footage inside Minsk metro moments after bombing

Video- 'Depleted uranium's toxic legacy to poison Libya for 40 years'

Monday, April 11, 2011

Video- Adam Vs The Man World Premier (Adam Kokesh) - RT America

Video- Adam VS The Man Debuts on RT

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Japan to pump radioactive water into sea until Sunday

Shinichi Saoshiro and Yoko Kubota,
Reuters
April 9, 2011

Japan will pump radioactive water into the sea from a crippled nuclear plant until Sunday, a day later than previously planned, its nuclear safety agency said.

The announcement came a day after China expressed concern at the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi plant smashed by last month’s earthquake, reflecting growing international unease over the month-long nuclear crisis.

“We are working on releasing water … we are likely to finish this tomorrow,” Hidehiko Nishiyama, a deputy director- general at Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, told reporters today.

Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) said earlier it expected to stop pumping tainted water into the sea on Saturday, but work was interrupted by a powerful aftershock on Thursday.

Full article here

Video- Fluoride Spill At Illinois Water Facility Requires Haz-Mat Response, But It’s Ok To Drink

Federal Jack
You Tube
April 9, 2011

Hydrofluorosilicic Acid is deadly, and it’s an ingredient in most U.S. fluoridated water municipalities [see chart].

Fluoride spill at water facility literally burns holes in parking lot cement

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News

(NaturalNews) A recent chemical spill at a water treatment facility in Rock Island, Ill., required the assistance of an emergency relief crew decked in the very same type of hazmat suits being worn by workers at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear plant in Japan. Except instead of radiation, the leaked chemical at the water plant was actually hydrofluorosilicic acid, a chemical fluoride component commonly added to drinking supplies for the stated purpose of preventing cavities. This fluoride chemical is so hazardous that it actually began to burn through parking lot cement in Rock Island before emergency crews arrived on the scene.

According to reports from WQAD News 8 in Moline, a tanker truck delivering the fluoride began to overflow, leaking the chemical directly onto the parking lot where it spilled down towards the street. And before emergency crews arrived on the scene in full hazmat suits and gas masks, the fluoride had actually begun to burn a hole right through the concrete.

“It’s a corrosive agent that the water treatment plant uses,” said Rock Island assistant fire chief Jeff Yerkey, concerning the spilled fluoride. He explained that the crews had to use earthen berms, dirt, sand, and commercial broom equipment to stop the leak. Yerkey also added that there was no “inhalation hazard” from the incident, and no evacuation of local residents was required.

To see the full WQAD News 8 video report of the incident, which includes footage of hazmat workers being hosed off after the incident to ensure that no fluoride residues remained, visit:

http://www.wqad.com/news/rock-islan…

What is truly amazing about the incident is that this very same fluoride, which fire chief Yerkey specifically called a “corrosive agent,” is deliberately added to drinking water supplies across the nation. This highly-toxic chemical that, when spilled, requires similar protective equipment as does a radioactive fallout situation, is being added to millions of Americans drinking water supplies every single day in the name of promoting health.

In reality, the events surrounding this fluoride spill are more than enough proof for any rationally-minded person that adding this poison to water supplies is a bad idea. Anything that requires the use of a protective suit and gas mask in order to handle — and that burns a hole directly through concrete — simply cannot be good for the body when ingested.

To learn more about where the chemical fluoride additives pumped into water supplies actually come from, check out the NaturalNews.TV video The Fluoride Deception:

http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=4…

—–

Video- Soros: Dollar ‘no longer’ reserve currency

Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
April 9, 2011

During his Bretton Woods II weekend conference, billionaire financier George Soros has issued many bold statements, not the least of which included claiming that the Dollar had already fallen as the world’s reserve currency, and is now reduced to sharing the role, in an interview with Bloomberg:

The big question is whether the U.S. dollar should be the reserve currency; it no longer is, it shares that role with the euro, other currencies, and commodities. But it’s not just gold being used as a substitute, but oil too, which is putting upward pressure on the market.

Soros has convened the Bretton Woods II event in hopes of leading financial reforms and formulating a replacement to the dollar on the world market. He has argued that the original Bretton Woods agreements, which also created the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), have been outmoded and are in need of new arrangements.

Meanwhile, Soros prescribed more debt for the U.S., urging against calls to shrink the budget. “There is very a strong push to tighten the budget as a way to reduce government spending… In my opinion, the country could actually absorb some more debt in order to get the economy going,” he said.

“If you have a growing economy, you can tolerate a higher level of debt.”

Perhaps Soros’ comments reached Washington in time, as their budget cuts only amounted to a paltry $38 billion, a literal drop in the bucket to mounting national debt.

In other matters, Soros estimated that despite the risks of inflation in China, it had emerged as the the ‘big winner’ of the financial crisis. It had been largely immune to the collapse due to its ‘isolation,’ he indicated. Indeed, ‘China was the main beneficiary of globalization,’ Soros said.

Soros also commented on other matters, like the ECB interest rate hike. Further statements are expected to emerge from him and other figures attending the Bretton Woods II conference after it concludes.

Last-minute budget deal narrowly avoids the Big Government shutdown

Mike Adams
Natural News
April 9, 2011

The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats want to spend us into oblivion while the Republicans only want to spend us into purgatory. The idea of actually running a balanced budget has never seriously occurred to either party. Government, after all, increases its popularity by confiscating money from some people and redistributing it to other people while keeping at least half of all that money for itself.

The whole fiasco became perfectly clear over the last few hours when, after days of intense haggling and late-night negotiation sessions, the Republicans and Democrats suddenly came to an agreement that would keep the government up and running for another week. And what does that agreement entail? Drop-in-the-bucket cuts of a mere $38.5 billion(http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/u…) out of a federal budget that has now ballooned to over $6 trillion dollars for 2011 (http://www.usgovernmentspending.com…).

The federal deficit for 2011 alone will be $1.6 trillion. To put all this in perspective, if federal spending for 2011 were the length of a football field, the $38.5 billion in budget cuts amount to less than two linear feet. It’s sort of like saying we need to score a touchdown in order to save America, but the best the Republicans and Democrats can negotiate is starting us out on the one yard line in our own back field! (To use a sports metaphor…)
Here’s another way to look at it:

Geniuses need not apply

Imagine, if you will, that you run a household which earns $5,000 a month in income. But you spend $15,000 a month on your credit cards. And you’ve been doing it for 20 years. So you now have a multi-million-dollar debt burden with compounding interest. Things are spinning wildly out of control. Something must be done!

So you convene an “emergency spending cut” meeting with your family members, and you explain that if you don’t cut spending, your family will go bankrupt and you’ll have to sell your home and all your possessions. Your family members meet for days on end, discussing the problem and staying up late into the night to try to cut your spending. They negotiate and bargain, but everybody is convinced their own spending is crucial for the survival of the family.

Somehow, a difficult negotiation eventually leads to an agreement. We will cut spending! And how much spending will we cut? A whopping $96 a month!

So now, instead of spending $15,000 a month that you don’t have, you’re “only” spending $14,904 that you don’t have! Amazing! We’re cutting our spending!
Are you now “saved” from your debt? Of course not! You’re still headed to the same financial collapse, but only at an insignificantly smaller rate of speed.

These numbers are roughly proportional to what has just been negotiated in Washington, by the way. Can you see how utterly useless these so-called “cuts” really are in tackling the exploding national debt?

The whole idiotic fiasco is shameful beyond belief. What’s most shocking is that in an age when Big Government is spending us all into economic ruin, even the “cut Big Government” Republicans can only walk out of the room with a scant $38.5 billion in reductions. And they call it a victory.

And if you can believe this, President Obama actually called it the “the biggest annual spending cut in history.” (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_spend…)

Seriously. Do these jokers think we are all complete idiots?

Why we must start cutting trillions from federal spending

Folks, let me lay it out straight for you: If we don’t start cutting government spending by the TRILLIONS, the United States of America is financially doomed. To have any hope of long-term financial sustainability, we need to cut about 80% of federal spending right now and get government down around $1 trillion a year in total spending. At that size, we could actually start paying back our national debt and get back in control of our own financial destiny.

But of course, that would be impossible because people expect government to deliver all these “essential government services” — even if it means going broke in the process and shifting all the debt to the next generation of taxpaying suckers. That’s the plan of the Democrats, by the way: Spend as much as possible and pretend the laws of economics no longer apply. Or just hope the next generation will somehow figure out a way to pay for it…

Are these services really essential?

I’m fascinated by the mainstream media coverage of this pending government shutdown. One prominent online newspaper says it would halt “essential government services” such as sending out tax refund checks. Of course, they completely fail to point out that if the government wasn’t confiscating a portion of your salary in the first place, you wouldn’t have to wait on them to send you back the money you already earned.

But that’s the question, really: What are “essential government services?” Aside from defending our shores and delivering the mail, there isn’t much the federal government should really do exceptget out of our wayand stop interfering into the lives of the American people who are trying to earn an honest living. Sure, I can see legitimate arguments for environmental controls on companies and the regulation of medicines, but if you really look at what that intention has turned into these days, government regulators have all become the marketing branches of the very industries they were supposed to regulate.

The FDA, for example, is really Big Pharma’s P.R. department. The USDA is Big Ag’s marketing branch. The DEA eliminate street drugs so that the drug companies can sell the exact same chemicals to children at monopoly prices (ADHD drugs are “speed”). The CDC is a total pharmaceutical sellout that pushes vaccines instead of real science. In nearly every case, the public would actually be better offwithoutthese so-called “regulators” which are actually just enforcers of the corporate-controlled monopoly state.

The government health care disaster

So what else does government do that actually helps anybody? It hands out health care services, people say, under Medicare and Medicaid. And yet it is precisely Big Government thatpreventspeople from accessing cheaper, safer natural health alternatives that wouldeliminateup to 80% of the cancers in this country in the first place.

Government is standing in the way of sensible disease prevention solutions that exist right now but cannot be honestly marketed because the FDA and FTC threaten anyone who makes a disease treatment claim for any natural product — even if that claim is scientifically true and validated!
(http://www.naturalnews.com/032002_f…)

When it comes to health, make no mistake: Government isn’t handing out health care; it’s handing out disease and suffering while protecting the pharmaceutical monopoly that denies lasting health to the People!

What about charity and science?

What about government charity to help those in need? The term “government charity” is an oxymoron, of course. You can’t claim to be charitable if you’re forcefully taking money from one group and then giving it to another. That’s not charity: It’s theft.

Real charity must be based on thevoluntarydonation of funds to a charitable cause. And if we could all get the onerous tax burden of Big Government off our backs, all sorts of people would open up to giving more to charity at the local level. Churches, cities and states operate charities with far greater efficiency than a centralized federal government that has no clue what’s happening on the streets in your local town, of course.

Oh, but what about all the research the government conducts in the name of science? Are you kidding me? Most of the “science” conducted by the government is fraudulent because it’s heavily influenced by the financial interests of industry. Very rarely does an institution like the NIH, for example, actually produce useful research that helps improve the quality of life for the average American. Most of Big Government’s so-called “research” is really just a bunch of arrogant scientists taking trips on the taxpayer’s dime so they can meet each other at conferences and give each other awards for producing increasingly meaningless “science” that either has no practical purpose or is blatantly obvious in the first place.

Did you know that lung transplant recipients have a lower risk of lung cancer if they don’t smoke after the lung transplant? Gee, really? And it only took twenty million dollars in government money to find out. That’s government research for ya…

Federal government uses taxpayer money to murder millions of animals

The USDA, meanwhile, actually spends taxpayer money committing themass murder of animalsunder a program called “Bye Bye Blackbird.”
(http://www.naturalnews.com/031076_U…). Under this program, taxpayer money is used to poison and kill millions of birds, geese, beavers, foxes, mountain lions, wolves and many other animals (http://www.naturalnews.com/031084_b…). How’s that for taxpayer dollars being put to a good use?

Of course, most of the money Big Government deals with actually ends up in the hands of the rich Wall Street banksters. Remember the first $1 trillion bailout to the rich, wealthy elite in Washington? And then remember thesecondtrillion-dollar bailout? A third is no-doubt on the way.

You see, government is primarily in the business ofprotecting its corporate buddieswhile screwing over the American people. That’s why the government had no problem whatsoever coming up with a trillion dollars to hand out to a very tiny group of wealthy elite bankers while pretending that it still needs totax the peopleto raise the funds to operate.

Why the government never needed to tax the American people in the first place

Here’s the dirty little secret of government and taxation: There is no need to tax anyone at all. The federal government could simply create all the money it needs each year to run itself. Depending on how you count it, the total income tax revenues in a year are roughly $2 trillion, and the feds invented $1 trillion in a 24-hour period to bail out Wall Street. So why not just invent $2 trillion each year andeliminate the entire tax system?

Of course, as those familiar with monetary policy would rightly point out, this would debase the currency and ultimately lead to too many dollars being in circulation, driving up the price of goods. And yet government is doing that anyway! It’s creatingtrillions of dollarsin new money (M2 money supply) and debt instruments every year while pretending that somehow it still needs YOUR money to pay the bills!

Do you get this? Do you see that the entire tax system must have some other purpose than raising money to fund government? A government that has buyers for its debt can simply fund its own functions by selling more debt (and thereby stealing from the people through monetary debasement, but that’s another story).

So why is the tax system in place? Because the tax system is a very effective means forsocial control. There is absolutely no economic, fiscal or monetary reason why the government needs to take money from the People to fund its operations. That entire concept is a complete myth (and this doesn’t even get into the CAFR funds at the state level, either…)

Don’t we need members of Congress?

So what about government representing the People? Isn’t it important that we have Senators and Congressmen to make our laws and run our government? C’mon people, wake up! “You’re adults!” as Gerald Celente says (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUX-…). Do we really need these people in Washington — most of whom are complete corporate sellouts — telling us what to do?

Of course not. If the entire U.S. Congress were disbanded tomorrow, and we all just voted directly on the laws of the land, it would immediately end all the corporate lobbying, corruption and bribery of the lawmakers. Adirect democracywould eliminate the Congress and simply allow the People to vote on the laws themselves. But of course Congress will never allow that to happen because the No. 1 mission of every government body is toprotect its own power.

That’s the whole story with the TSA, the federal agency that’s now reaching down your pants at the airport. In just a few years, it grew from less than 200 employees to over 60,000. And now TSA agents are the new Nazi police of America, planting fake bags of cocaine in your luggage (http://www.naturalnews.com/030302_T…), sexually molesting little children and pretending to be making air travel “safe” while, in actuality, they consistently fail to detect even large guns that are carried right onto airplanes (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/loade…).

Protecting our shores… all the way over to their shores!

And what about wars? Well, most people would agree the government has at least ONE job: To protect our shores. But all the way to the shores of Tripoli? “Protecting our shores” does not mean “bombing Libya” and then claiming it’s some sort of “humanitarian mission” (a total lie, of course). Protecting our shores means keeping invaders off our land. And yet by running these insane imperialist wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, the U.S. government is actuallyinviting terroriststo recruit new members and bomb the bejeezus out of America.

Let’s face it: If you really want terrorists to hate America, just go out and provoke them first. Sure enough, they’ll target you for revenge. And then when we’re attacked with a dirty bomb nuke by some terrorist group in the future, the President will no doubt explain we’re being attacked because “they hate our freedom.” No they don’t. They hate imperialist invaders! They hate America for bombing them first and firing depleted uranium shells into their towns and villages, releasing deadly radiation that will contaminate their lands for centuries to come.

Can you imagine what we, the American people, would do if the Libyan army flew a bunch of planes over our country and started firing DU shells into our cities? How angry would we be? How motivated would we be to seek some sort of revenge on the Libyans? That’s how they feel about us, you see. And we provoked it.

That’s why Big Government actuallycauses more problems than it solves. It gets us into wars; it spends us into impossible debt; it protects corporate monopolies and denies people access to natural healing remedies. Government tramples on our freedoms, molests us at the airports, and takes away our Constitutional rights. Big Government gets us into wars we can’t afford and confiscates the money we’ve earned before we even get to see it.

And worst of all, Big Government can’t help butkeep getting bigger. It is now so bloated and so “fiscally obese” that even the threat of a total shutdown can only convince our lawmakers to cut a miniscule fraction of total spending — an amount that will make virtually no difference whatsoever in the fast-approaching financial bankruptcy of the U.S. government.

Mark my words, folks:The U.S. government will never get its debt under control. And that means it can only be headed toward one thing: A total debt blowout ending in financial collapse. Because while you can mock the laws of compounding interest for a while, you cannot alter them.No government can spend its way out of debt, no matter how much political spin is applied by the White House.

Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/032011_budget_deal_federal_spending.html#ixzz1J1HpRUUW